Mar 6, 2005

Marketing versus Marketing Communications

One of the (many) things that I find both amusing and frustrating in the ongoing debate about marketing's role in the business is that so often people on both sides on the debate (ie, marketing rules versus marketing sucks) forget that marketing isn't synonymous with marketing communications.

Marketing 101.

Marketing is the four Ps: Product, Price, Place, Promotion.

Marketing Communications is primarily concerned with one P: Promotion. It is part of marketing, it is not ALL of marketing.

Going forward in my writing, I plan to be very clear about which thing I am praising or criticizing: a marketing strategy or a marketing communications plan/tactic that is part of an overall marketing strategy.

It is an important distinction.

Posted @ 10:03AM in Business Management, Marketing, PR

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/196270/1969218

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Marketing versus Marketing Communications:

» Horse vs. Cart (bone before dog?) from Marketing Playbook
Susan Getgood picks up an old saw of ours about strategy vs. tactics: "so-so creative will still do all right if the fundamental strategy is sound. But the slickest promo campaign cannot save a crappy strategy. And you should... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 17, 2005 7:37:11 AM

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Marketing versus Marketing Communications:

» Ries and Moore: Both right, both wrong from hypocritical
I'm always happy when I stumble upon things that keep me thinking about previous posts. And today is no exception. Susan Getgood over at Marketing Roadmaps highlights the confusion between "marketing" and "marketing communications." [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 17, 2005 12:58:57 PM

Comments

Here, here! It is a very important distinction and one which I see discussed rarely. Blogs and marketing articles are thick with discussions on advertising and new marketing communication tools.

Just recently I read piece on Seth Godin's blog Called "The Tolstoy Rule" which was a perfect expample of the myopic nature of many marketing discusions: (http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2005/03/the_tolstoy_rul.html)

My point is that case studies of marketing (which he claims are not necessary) failures should go far beyond what marcom strategy failed into deconstruction of the overall marketing strategy.

They are not all alike unless you consider only the promotion aspect of the failures.

Posted by Bruce DeBoer | Mar 7, 2005 4:52:37 PM

Thanks for the note, and for visiting Marketing Roadmaps. I agree with you. I think we spend far too much time on creative, 'cause it's "fun" and not nearly enough time on getting the fundamental strategy right, 'cause that's HARD!

Scandalous though it may be, I believe that so-so creative will still do all right if the fundamental strategy is sound. But the slickest promo campaign cannot save a crappy strategy.

And you should always strive for excellence in both.

Posted by Susan Getgood | Mar 7, 2005 5:30:46 PM

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


About Susan


    GetGood Strategic Marketing

      View Capabilities Presentation

        Upcoming Speaking Engagements

      • www.flickr.com
        This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from sgetgood. Make your own badge here.

        Susan Getgood's Facebook profile

AddThis Feed Button

Subscribe by Email

Recent Posts

Top Posts

Recent Comments

Google Search

Archives